Organization design guide
Build an org chart that explains how work and authority flow
An organizational chart should do more than place names in boxes. It shows formal reporting lines, groups related roles and gives readers a dependable starting point for understanding decision ownership. A role-based chart is best for workforce planning and vacancies; a person-based chart is useful for onboarding and contact discovery. Decide which question the chart must answer before combining both views.
Prepare approved names, role titles, managers, departments, locations and employment status. Add concise responsibility statements or decision rights when titles alone are ambiguous. AI can organize the hierarchy, but HR or functional leaders must verify every reporting line. Do not infer seniority from document order, and do not publish private employee information beyond the intended audience.
Use stable identifiers when names, titles or team labels may change. A person can hold an interim role, one position can be vacant and one employee can contribute to several projects without changing the formal hierarchy. Capturing those states explicitly prevents duplicate nodes and makes future updates safer. For global organizations, note whether the primary grouping is functional, geographic, product-based or a deliberate matrix.
What belongs in an org chart?
Include the accountable leader, functions, teams, roles and direct reporting relationships. Distinguish permanent roles, contractors, dotted-line collaboration and vacancies. Add only the responsibility detail required to understand ownership.
Role-based or person-based?
Use roles to design the future organization and compare capacity; use people to explain the current organization. If both matter, label vacant or proposed roles clearly so readers do not mistake a target structure for today’s reporting model.